|
||||
RELOCATION CASESDuring 1996 the New York Court of Appeals attempted to set forth guidelines for the courts to use in addressing relocation cases. The court made clear that the “best interest” of the child are controlling. It did not however, clearly state how you determine “best interest” in a relocation context. Relocation cases are “fact sensitive” in that each case must be considered on its own facts and merits. The court elucidated a number of factors, which should be considered in assessing the impact of relocation: 1. The good
faith of the parents in requesting or opposing the move. 3. The possibility
of devising a visitation schedule that will enable the non-custodial
parent to maintain a meaningful parent-child relationship. 5. The negative impact, if any, from continued or exacerbated hostility between the custodial and non-custodial parents. 6. The effect that the move may have on any extended-family relationships. 7. The economic necessity of the move. 8. The specific health-related concern for the move. 9. The demands of a second marriage. 10. The custodial
parent’s opportunity to improve his or her economic situation.
Due to the
interplay of the complex factors involved, unfortunately there is
no predictability in assessing the chances of success of a relocation
application. |
||||